Home Economy China’s policy mix “proactive” and “prudent” in name, but tightening in practice

China’s policy mix “proactive” and “prudent” in name, but tightening in practice

Françoise Huang
The Chinese stimulus will not be saving the global economy this time round. In fact, there are already clear signs of its policy mix tightening
Senior Economist for Asia-Pacific at Euler Hermes
The People's Bank of China in Beijing

Authorities in China are describing the policy mix in 2021 as “proactive” on the fiscal side, and “prudent” on the monetary side. However, China’s monetary policy already started to tighten in the fourth quarter of 2020, in sharp contrast to the world’s other major economies (see Exhibit 1).

In fact, our proprietary credit impulse index shows that in 2020 China’s monetary easing lasted for less time than in 2008-09 (by three months) and represented only about 40% of the monetary stimulus implemented then (see Exhibit 2). This is slightly more than the one-third we had anticipated in mid-2020, but still relatively low.

Exhibit 1: Proprietary monetary impulse indices

Both domestic and external conditions are ripe for Chinese authorities to tighten the policy mix. We estimate that the US super stimulus could boost China’s exports over 2021-22 by $60 billion (0.2% of GDP).

At the same time, China’s own economic recovery is sufficiently strong (GDP growth at 2.3% in 2020 and 8.2% expected in 2021), despite disparities. While retail sales contracted in 2020, labour market and household income indices suggest that the recovery of private consumption is likely to extend well into 2021.

The normalisation of monetary policy is likely to happen at a faster pace than fiscal policy. We estimate fiscal support will decline to 4.6% of GDP in 2021 from 7.1% of GDP in 2020, with less infrastructure investment. But this still remains relatively generous compared to the past (2.9% on average in 2018-2019).

Exhibit 2: Comparison of monetary easing episodes in China, based on our proprietary credit impulse index

Policy tightening to tackle financial vulnerabilities and asset price bubbles

China’s policy tightening will aim at tackling financial vulnerabilities and asset price bubbles rather than consumer inflation. China’s CPI grew by 2.5% year-on-year in 2020, compared to an official (non-binding) target of “around 3.5%”. Consumer inflation even turned slightly negative in the first months of 2021 – although this situation is unlikely to last for long (we expect 1.9% over 2021) and China’s producer prices are probably more relevant for policymakers and the rest of the world.

The aim of China’s policy tightening is more about managing financial vulnerabilities and addressing the risk of overheating in the real estate and financial markets. China’s debt-to-GDP ratio rose to 285% at the end of the third quarter in 2020, compared to 251% on average over 2016-2019. The real estate sector has been one of the main drivers of China’s post-COVID economic recovery. Housing prices are still growing at a moderate pace compared to the past, but could accelerate as measures of inventories are declining quickly (see Exhibit 3).

Meanwhile, the CSI 300 total return grew by 18% in 2020 compared to 3.4% on average over 2016-2019, and the balance of margin long positions rose by RMB262 billion compared to an average yearly change of negative RMB67 billion over 2016-2019. This reveals some increase in short-term risk appetite and speculative behaviours.

Exhibit 3: Real estate: prices and inventories (right-hand scale inverted)

A flexible approach instead of policy rate hikes in 2021

The sharp rise in corporate bond spreads in late 2020 (see Exhibit 4), the renewed COVID-19 outbreaks in early 2021 and most recently the sell-off in the equity market mean that China’s policymakers will likely avoid high-profile actions that could signal a policy cliff and jeopardise the economic recovery. Instead, we think the People’s Bank of China will adopt a data-dependent and flexible approach, using its liquidity facilities to guide a gradual tightening of financial conditions.

Exhibit 4: Interbank rate and industrial bond credit spread

Focus shifts back to financial stability

As the focus comes back to financial stability, macroprudential rules and regulations will also be part of policymakers’ toolbox. New rules that came into effect at the beginning of 2021 put in place a system that caps banks’ exposure to mortgages and property loans. As they have done in the past, and depending on the local real estate market, authorities could consider making rules and requirements for housing purchases more stringent.

A regulatory storm has also hit online lending since last autumn. In particular, companies favoured online micro lending over the past few years, after a government crackdown against peer-to-peer lending in 2016. Regulators are now paying attention to this space, with new rules capping online microloan companies’ exposure to single borrowers, putting a minimum threshold for their share of funding in loans jointly sourced with banks, and also sharing with regulators data on borrowers’ creditworthiness, among other measures.

What does this mean for companies and financial markets?

The divergence of China’s policy stance from the rest of the world means that there could be room for further appreciation of the renminbi, although most of it may already be past. We expect the USDCNY onshore rate towards 6.3 at the end of 2021 (versus 6.5 in mid-March 2021, 6.5 at end-2020 and 7.0 at end-2019).

Our baseline scenario of a gradual and successful policy normalisation means that credit growth—through banks and capital markets—will continue slowing in 2021. Particular attention should be given to the impact on the comparatively more fragile sectors and provinces as we find a positive correlation between a province’s public debt-to-GDP ratio and its corporate bond default ratio.


China’s earlier economic recovery means that authorities there can afford to shift their focus to long-term challenges, and normalise the policy stance. That is, of course, a fine line to walk, as excessive tightening could jeopardise the recovery, while insufficient tightening would risk exacerbating financial vulnerabilities. For the rest of the world, China’s policy normalisation is important to monitor, not only because of the country’s position in the global economy, but also because this earlier experience could be demonstrative for other countries’ policymaking in a post-COVID world.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Author profile
Senior Economist for Asia-Pacific at Euler Hermes

Françoise joined Euler Hermes in 2019 as a senior economist for Asia-Pacific. Prior to this, Françoise worked as an Economist for over five years at the equity broker Exane BNP Paribas in London. There, she was in charge of the macroeconomic analysis of the Chinese economy and Emerging Markets. She also worked on global and European topical themes. Her other work experiences include the ACPR, the French supervisor for the banking and insurance sectors.

You may also like